replyforall
  • faqs
  • blog
    • log in
    • |
    • sign up
    •  
  • sign up
  • how to get your personal email signature for Outlook 2007 or Yahoo Mail, Gmail, Hotmail
  • impact
  • causes
  • the advertising sponsors in your email signature
  • Share |
  • Recent Posts

    • World Water Day is March 22nd, what can you do?
    • The fight to provide clean water
    • replyforall spotlight on: Petfinder.com Foundation
    • States take the lead on animal rights legislation
    • Foie Gras the Faux Pas
  • Archives

    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • July 2008

Posts Tagged ‘animal research’

Tech alternatives to testing, eating animals

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Cruelty is a big topic when considering the rights of our animal friends, and science seems to be taking the lead over legislation.   The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in US v. Stevens that selling videos of dog fights and animal brutality and such is completely protected under our First Amendment rights.  (For the record, dogfighting is illegal in all 50 states and a felony in most.  The message here: apparently it’s not okay to harm animals, but if you just so happen to have video of the heinous crime, it’s totally fine to sell it for a profit.)  This is going on at the same time New Zealand is working to toughen penalties for those who harm animals.

Luckily, it looks like science is making some forward strides in animal rights when it comes to cosmetic testing and what I like to call Petri Pork.  Both take the animal out of the situation and use cells instead.   L’Oreal helped to fund research at the Hurel Corp. to create technology that uses lab-grown human skin cells.  There’s still a long way to go to make sure that the results are accurate, but if so, mice and guinea pigs could be spared.  That’s huge, since it’s estimated that 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals are used for testing each year (almost all die, either from the testing or euthanasia).  Is it worth it to manipulate human cells if it means sparing the lives of millions of animals?

What about stem cells?  Scientists in the Netherlands have developed a way to use the stem cells of pigs to grow meat in a petri dish.  They believe that, once embraced, the practice could alleviate world hunger, save the lives of pigs, and offer a green solution to raising livestock.  The only question is, who will eat Petri Pork?  While factory farming isn’t all that natural, either, meat from a petri dish may be a hard sell… what do you think? Take our poll at the bottom of this page!

If you have any news that you’d like to see shared with our replyforall users, email Johanna with your article, video, or link!  We’d love to hear from you.

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

This signature helps defend animal rights if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Defend Animal Rights
To make foie gras birds are force-fed huge amounts of food, leading to enlarged livers & internal damage.
By using this email signature, Johanna and ASPCA provided an hour of protective services for 19 animals.

Related articles to check out:
  • Court takes up free-speech case of pit bull videos (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
  • Lawmakers Forced to Choose Between Welfare of Budget, Animals (takepart.com)
  • Animal welfare victories prompt farmers’ PR moves (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
  • Food and Feelings: Animals and the Ethics Behind Eating (replyforall.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: animal research, animal rights, animal testing, Animal welfare, Factory farming, Johanna Hudgens, New Zealand, pig stem cells, protect animal rights, Replyforall, United States
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

sign up for your personalized email signature. works with Yahoo Mail, Gmail, Hotmail or Outlook 2007
  • terms of service |
  • privacy policy |
  • contact us |
  • about us