replyforall
  • faqs
  • blog
    • log in
    • |
    • sign up
    •  
  • sign up
  • how to get your personal email signature for Outlook 2007 or Yahoo Mail, Gmail, Hotmail
  • impact
  • causes
  • the advertising sponsors in your email signature
  • Share |
  • Recent Posts

    • The fight to provide clean water
    • replyforall spotlight on: Petfinder.com Foundation
    • States take the lead on animal rights legislation
    • Foie Gras the Faux Pas
    • replyforall spotlight on: Partners in Health
  • Archives

    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • July 2008

Archive for February, 2010

States take the lead on animal rights legislation

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Over the last few weeks, a lot has been happening in state legislatures regarding breeding facilities, animal abuse, and chaining dogs. We wanted to update you about a few of them so together we can celebrate this huge step forward in protecting animal rights.

Regulating “Puppy Mills”

This week in Iowa, the state legislature passed a bill that would require more regulation of dog breeding facilities, often called puppy mills.  The bill, awaiting the governor’s signature as I write this, would give greater state oversight of the facilities to ensure the animals are well treated.  Some legislators, however, expressed concern that this type of bill would lead to regulating livestock raised for food production (animal agriculture is exempt from the regulation).  As one Republican state senator said, “They’re going to be back next year…they’re going to ask to restrict layer cages. They’re going to ask to eliminate gestation crates for sows. They’re going to make sure that our livestock has access to open air at all times [or] something like that, it’s coming.”  Bring it on, we say!

Regulating Dogs on Chains

Many states already have regulation regarding tethering or chaining dogs.  According to the Animal Law Coalition, thirteen states have already passed laws requiring shelter or minimum tether lengths, and similar bills are being considered in seven other states.  One bill in Illinois would be the strictest yet– requiring that tethered dogs must be visible to the owners.  This reflects laws passed in counties already like Ashville, NC and Miami/Dade County, FL.  Abolishing the practice altogether would be difficult, however, when it comes to enforcing such a law.

Animal Abuse Registry

This might be the most progressive animal rights bill yet, and it comes from the sunny state of California.  A bill proposed in the state legislature would create an online registry for animal abusers; similar to a sex offenders registry, it would include the abusers’ home addresses and places of employment.  Any person convicted of a felon involving animal cruelty would be registered.  The bill stems from evidence that animal abuse is often a warning sign of future, more heinous crimes.   Similar bills have been introduced in other states, but none have been passed.  What do you think about having a state registry of animal abusers?  Let us know!

Picture 1These are just a few examples of the coming surge of animal rights bills in legislatures across the United States.  And most of our readers believe that it is up to the government to protect animal rights– check out the results from our last poll.

Come back next week as we wrap up our focus on protecting animal rights with a profile of one of our nonprofit partners, PetFinder.com Foundation.

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

This signature helps defend animal rights if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Defend Animal Rights
As many as 100 million invertebrate animals are used for testing each year.
By using this email signature, Johanna and ASPCA provided an hour of protective services for 52 animals.
Related articles to check out:
  • Farmers fight back against animal rights groups (sfgate.com)
  • Registering animal abusers like sex offenders (timesunion.com)
  • Iowa lawmakers consider dog breeder measure (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: Agriculture, animal rights, Animal welfare, California, Cruelty to animals, Iowa, Johanna Hudgens, protect animal rights, Puppy mill, Replyforall, United States
Posted in news | No Comments »

Foie Gras the Faux Pas

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

Survey Results Petri PorkWell, the results are in!  Two weeks ago we surveyed our users to find out if they would eat lab-grown pork, and if they supported cosmetics testing on human skin cells.  Over half of our users believe that they would maybe try Petri Pork, citing that if it tastes good, why not?  One respondent even wrote, “We eat produce that’s been genetically modified-is this such a stretch?”  Very true– who can forget about the strawberries with fish DNA?  When it comes to cosmetics testing, 91% of our survey respondents support the use of human skin cells in place of animals.

Picture 3

This week, we wanted to tell you about some legislation going through a couple of states.  First, if you’ve been following replyforall on Facebook, you may have seen a post we published about Leona Lewis, who refused to perform at a British awards show until they took Foie Gras off the menu.

Now, in Hawaii, a bill hopes to ban the dish completely from the state.   Foie gras, french for “fat liver,” depends on force feeding ducks and geese several times a day until they develop liver disease.  This causes the liver to swell up to ten times their normal size; and yes, that is the delicacy people pay so much money to eat.

Some food bloggers, including former pastry chef Edward T. Morita, says the force feeding isn’t cruel, citing that “ducks and geese don’t have a gag reflex, so it doesn’t bother them at all.”  Regardless of the force feeding, is he implying that liver disease isn’t painful?

Hawaii isn’t the first state to take this legislative step to protect the rights of geese and ducks in factory farms.  California has passed a ban to take effect in 2012– this coming from a state where half of the US production of foie gras takes place.  Even Chicago voted to ban the dish, but it was repealed just two years later.

What do you think? Take our quick poll below!

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

This signature helps defend animal rights if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Defend Animal Rights
Most captive parakeets die within 2 years of birth, compared to 8 in the wild, usually due to negligence.
By using this email signature, Johanna and ASPCA provided an hour of protective services for 47 animals.

Related articles to check out:
  • End the horror of foie gras (thepetitionsite.com)
  • Britain Embraces Faux Gras, An Alternative To Unethical Delicacy (huffingtonpost.com)
  • Chef criticized for foie gras on menu (cbc.ca)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: animal rights, California, ducks, Factory farming, Foie gras, Force-feeding, geese, Hawaii, Johanna Hudgens, Leona Lewis, Liver, Replyforall
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

replyforall spotlight on: Partners in Health

Monday, February 8th, 2010

hi there, everyone!

we’re excited to kick-off the 1st of a new series in which we feature one of our partner organizations each month.  quickly skim it to learn a bit more about our partners’ great work!

we kick off with our non-profit partner Partners in Health.  they’ve been working in Haiti for over two decades.


What is the mission of your organization?
Partners In Health (PIH) works in 12 countries to deliver quality health care to people and communities devastated by joint burdens of poverty and disease.  PIH’s work has three goals: to care for patients, to alleviate the root causes of disease, and to share lessons learned around the world.

What sets your organization apart from other groups in a similar field?

First, while our health centers and hospitals provide a full range of medical care, we take a comprehensive view of health, which includes programs that address potable water, nutrition, housing, and education. Second, we invest in both the public health infrastructure by accompanying Ministries of Health in their activities, and in the local workforce by relying on paid and trained community health workers in the countries where we work. Lastly, PIH stands out because of our extremely low overhead rate: 94% of every dollar raised goes directly to our programs around the world.

What’s the context for PIH’s presence in Haiti?
For more than 20 years, PIH has been providing vital health care services in Haiti’s Central Plateau and Artibonite Valley.  Working alongside the Ministry of Health to serve a catchment area of 1.2 million people, PIH has become one of the largest health care providers in the country. PIH already had more than 100 doctors, 600 nurses, and a total of 4,000 employees on the ground in Haiti working from 12 existing PIH medical facilities in Haiti before the earthquake struck.

In what new ways have you reached out to supporters in the last year?
We have been working extensively with our supporters to help them form “Communities of Concern,” supporter-driven groups that raise awareness and funds for PIH’s work around the world. We have also released online tools that allow our supporters to initiate personalized fundraising campaigns, connect with other advocates and PIH supporters, and communicate with PIH staff. Learn more at http://act.pih.org.

Aside from donations, what is the one thing that supporters can do to support your organization’s work?
Stay informed and raise awareness:

· Friend us on Facebook

· Follow us on Twitter

· Join our mailing list

stay tuned next month for our next profile! email us if you have any questions to include for any of our partner orgs.

thanks for your continued support,

the replyforall team

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: Haiti, Health care, HIV/AIDS, Partners in Health, provide clean water, Replyforall
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Tech alternatives to testing, eating animals

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Cruelty is a big topic when considering the rights of our animal friends, and science seems to be taking the lead over legislation.   The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in US v. Stevens that selling videos of dog fights and animal brutality and such is completely protected under our First Amendment rights.  (For the record, dogfighting is illegal in all 50 states and a felony in most.  The message here: apparently it’s not okay to harm animals, but if you just so happen to have video of the heinous crime, it’s totally fine to sell it for a profit.)  This is going on at the same time New Zealand is working to toughen penalties for those who harm animals.

Luckily, it looks like science is making some forward strides in animal rights when it comes to cosmetic testing and what I like to call Petri Pork.  Both take the animal out of the situation and use cells instead.   L’Oreal helped to fund research at the Hurel Corp. to create technology that uses lab-grown human skin cells.  There’s still a long way to go to make sure that the results are accurate, but if so, mice and guinea pigs could be spared.  That’s huge, since it’s estimated that 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals are used for testing each year (almost all die, either from the testing or euthanasia).  Is it worth it to manipulate human cells if it means sparing the lives of millions of animals?

What about stem cells?  Scientists in the Netherlands have developed a way to use the stem cells of pigs to grow meat in a petri dish.  They believe that, once embraced, the practice could alleviate world hunger, save the lives of pigs, and offer a green solution to raising livestock.  The only question is, who will eat Petri Pork?  While factory farming isn’t all that natural, either, meat from a petri dish may be a hard sell… what do you think? Take our poll at the bottom of this page!

If you have any news that you’d like to see shared with our replyforall users, email Johanna with your article, video, or link!  We’d love to hear from you.

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

This signature helps defend animal rights if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Defend Animal Rights
To make foie gras birds are force-fed huge amounts of food, leading to enlarged livers & internal damage.
By using this email signature, Johanna and ASPCA provided an hour of protective services for 19 animals.

Related articles to check out:
  • Court takes up free-speech case of pit bull videos (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
  • Lawmakers Forced to Choose Between Welfare of Budget, Animals (takepart.com)
  • Animal welfare victories prompt farmers’ PR moves (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
  • Food and Feelings: Animals and the Ethics Behind Eating (replyforall.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: animal research, animal rights, animal testing, Animal welfare, Factory farming, Johanna Hudgens, New Zealand, pig stem cells, protect animal rights, Replyforall, United States
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

sign up for your personalized email signature. works with Yahoo Mail, Gmail, Hotmail or Outlook 2007
  • terms of service |
  • privacy policy |
  • contact us |
  • about us