replyforall
  • faqs
  • blog
    • log in
    • |
    • sign up
    •  
  • sign up
  • how to get your personal email signature for Outlook 2007 or Yahoo Mail, Gmail, Hotmail
  • impact
  • causes
  • the advertising sponsors in your email signature
  • Share |
  • Recent Posts

    • World Water Day is March 22nd, what can you do?
    • The fight to provide clean water
    • replyforall spotlight on: Petfinder.com Foundation
    • States take the lead on animal rights legislation
    • Foie Gras the Faux Pas
  • Archives

    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • July 2008

Archive for December, 2008

Our sponsor The Body Shop features us on their blog!

Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008

We’ve been excited to partner with The Body Shop as our sponsor.  They’re a great, values-minded company that has helped blaze the path for businesses doing well and doing good.

As you’ve seen in our signatures for the past couple of months, The Body Shop has been helping to financially support the causes that are important to us.  More recently, they’ve also featured replyforall on their company’s blog.  Thanks to The Body Shop for spreading the word!

Posted in news | No Comments »

Beyond the money: other costs of nuclear power

Tuesday, December 9th, 2008

Water for Nuclear Power

So now that I’ve written about how much nuclear energy has cost us money-wise, I want to take a look at how it’s costing us in other ways.  The one of the big things about nuclear energy is that it is an alternative to oil, a foreign dependency that has gotten us into a lot of trouble in recent months.

But “alternative” does not mean that same thing as “renewable.”  Let’s go over the first common-sense reason as to why nuclear is not the best option: it takes millions of years to produce the plutonium and uranium that is converted into energy, just like oil.  Which means that, at the rate that we consume, that other countries develop, and that the world population grows, we are effectively in short supply.  Down the road—it may be 50 years, it may be 200—we will have to deal with the scarcity of plutonium or uranium, and be caught back in the same boat we are sinking in now.  The resources are just not producing themselves as fast as we are consuming them.

That can be said for lots of things, though, so now it’s a question of costs versus benefits—are the benefits of nuclear power enough to outweigh the costs?  I’m already leaning towards “no,” now that I’m aware of how much money the country has spent on this energy source, but the kicker for me is the environment.

Aside from the plutonium shortage in the future, there are other costs to the environment.  Who knew that water was so important?

Nuclear power needs water for two things: to convey heat from the reactor core to the steam turbines, and to remove and dump surplus heat from this steam circuit.  That means a lot of water, usually freshwater (except for those plants right on a body of salt water)—up to 60,000 gallons per mega Watt hour (MWh).

This may sound like a lot, and it is, but the water that does not evaporate while cooling the reactor cores is put back into the body of water.  And now we have two problems: the water resource use, and the water discharge.  According to the EPA, removing water at large amounts can be dangerous for aquatic life, as well as discharging spent water back into the environment at higher temperatures and with traces of radioactive elements. A 2005 study showed that one nuclear power plant in California was responsible for killing 3.5 million fish in just one year.

In fact, messing with the water systems on such a large scale may exacerbate the effects of global warming, specifically weather patterns.  Removing large amounts of water from one area can lead increased and prolonged drought.  And that’s a problem for nuclear power plants—if there is a drought, there won’t be enough water to run the reactors, and electricity cannot be generated.  If this seems far from possible, plants in Alabama and Tennessee have been shut down because of drought, and more will shut down if a drought continues.

In short, I think the costs of nuclear power are starting to add up.  It is very irresponsible to waste water on energy production when we need it for, oh, I don’t know… say, animals? Fish? Agriculture?  We don’t need water to produce energy—and if we decided to, there are ways to use it without working against two of replyforall’s causes, global warming and clean water.

Stay tuned for my last segment on radioactive waste.  Hopefully I’ll have convinced you by then to be anti-nuclear, and we can get out there and convince the Obama Administration, too.

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

Wellesley College 2009

Tags: alternative energy, clean water, global warming, Johanna Hudgens, nuclear power, Renewable Energy
Posted in news | No Comments »

Millennials Changing America: Talking with Eric Volz

Tuesday, December 9th, 2008

null

It was very much my pleasure to spend most of yesterday with Eric Volz, a young magazine editor who spend most of 2007 in a Nicaraguan jail. Imprisoned for what he and his friends and family have insisted was a wrongful conviction for the rape and murder of his ex-girlfriend Doris Ivania Jiménez, his conviction was overturned in December of 2007 and he ow lives free in the United States.

The day before I was to meet up with Volz, the Nicaraguan government, following the election of President Daniel Ortega, announced that it would be revisiting Volz case. By the time I had met with him, that decision, to Volz’s relief, had passed.

Volz is exceedingly thoughtful and measured. We discussed the political implications of his situation, how he processed the experience, and what he plans on doing from here.

Further, we talked about the web campaign which helped to keep the spotlight on his case as it was happen, so that his case would not be forgotten by his supporters, or so that it couldn’t be swept under the rug of either governments involved. The website was started by his mother as a means of staying in touch with his tens of thousands of supporters and it grew into a substantial information network. YouTube videos were made in support of Volz and people were kept up to date with his case. Letters were written and forwarded to him through the site, news coverage was archived, and the details of his situation were documented accordingly. The grassroots effort kept his case consistently relevant, especially to the mainstream media, which kept consistently kept its finger on the pulse of his case.

Further, we discussed the hesitance to be expressive that comes when one is instantly propelled into being an authority on an issue, as has happened with Volz regarding instability in the country, or as an international that has been wrongfully imprisoned. Further, we discussed what his next steps are. He’s asking himself how he takes this momentum created during his campaign to get out (largely managed by his mother). He wants to represent and highlight situations similar to his, but he’s still not sure where to go with that yet.

“I’m trying to figure out how to move forward with all of this,” he explained. “But the whole time I was gone, the Internet pretty much changed overnight. My mom ran the site while I was in prison. Now I’m figuring it out.”

The hard part’s over, at least. Now Volz is figuring out how to take the support graciously offered to him, and the organization, and working on understanding how to positively and constructively leverage his experience in a meaningful and impactful manner.

null

Posted in news | No Comments »

sign up for your personalized email signature. works with Yahoo Mail, Gmail, Hotmail or Outlook 2007
  • terms of service |
  • privacy policy |
  • contact us |
  • about us