We all want to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and with as little damage to our day-to-day life, and our pocketbooks as possible. But is nuclear the way to go?
Nuclear power has been around since 1951, when the first nuclear reactor was used to create electricity. Did you know that, in 1952, Harry Truman was given a negative assessment of nuclear energy by the Paley Commission, that recommended instead aggressive research into the whole field of solar energy?
That recommendation was, of course, very early on in the development of nuclear power. Of course, the meltdown of nuclear power plants easily supports this assessment the first partial meltdown took place in that first reactor, after less than five years on the grid. But I am not going to invoke the memories of Three Mile Island or Chernobyl as a reason to abandon nuclear energy. I want to talk about your money.
No one can argue against the fact that nuclear power has come a long way in the last fifty years. It definitely has, and the United States has spent lots of public money subsidizing nuclear energy to make sure this was the case. In fact, some studies claim that the US has spent over $150 billion in aggregate subsidies on nuclear energy. If you think that was just to get it up and running, President Bush signed an energy bill in 2005 that included $13 billion for incentives including tax breaks and subsidies for nuclear power.
One argument for nuclear power is the generation of cheap, carbon-neutral electricity, once hailed as too cheap to meter. But the first seventy-five nuclear power plants that were built went over budget by $100 billion. The last estimate for cost of a nuclear reactor was $12 billion dollars. For states that want to expand nuclear energy, this is a big price tag. In Utah, where they are currently expanding nuclear operations, the entire state budget is $5 million. The proposal in Emery County, Utah, clearly stated that it plans to use tax dollars to pay for its installation. Check out more about this particular project, and who is paying for it, here.
So were already paying for nuclear power. Weve gone way over budget on nuclear power in the past. And all of this for an upside to our proliferation of nuclear weapons? Now that Ive got your attention, stay tuned for the environmental costs of nuclear energy, both in production of electricity and disposal of waste.
Fight the good fight,
Johanna Hudgens
Wellesley College
Class of 2009









