replyforall
  • faqs
  • blog
    • log in
    • |
    • sign up
    •  
  • sign up
  • how to get your personal email signature for Outlook 2007 or Yahoo Mail, Gmail, Hotmail
  • impact
  • causes
  • the advertising sponsors in your email signature
  • Share |
  • Recent Posts

    • The fight to provide clean water
    • replyforall spotlight on: Petfinder.com Foundation
    • States take the lead on animal rights legislation
    • Foie Gras the Faux Pas
    • replyforall spotlight on: Partners in Health
  • Archives

    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • July 2008

Archive for November, 2008

The "green" of nuclear energy — money, that is

Sunday, November 23rd, 2008

Nuclear Power in US

We all want to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and with as little damage to our day-to-day life, and our pocketbooks as possible.  But is nuclear the way to go?

Nuclear power has been around since 1951, when the first nuclear reactor was used to create electricity.  Did you know that, in 1952, Harry Truman was given a negative assessment of nuclear energy by the Paley Commission, that recommended instead aggressive research into the whole field of solar energy?

That recommendation was, of course, very early on in the development of nuclear power.  Of course, the meltdown of nuclear power plants easily supports this assessment —the first partial meltdown took place in that first reactor, after less than five years on the grid. But I am not going to invoke the memories of Three Mile Island or Chernobyl as a reason to abandon nuclear energy.  I want to talk about your money.

No one can argue against the fact that nuclear power has come a long way in the last fifty years.  It definitely has, and the United States has spent lots of public money subsidizing nuclear energy to make sure this was the case. In fact, some studies claim that the US has spent over $150 billion in aggregate subsidies on nuclear energy.  If you think that was just to get it up and running, President Bush signed an energy bill in 2005 that included $13 billion for incentives including tax breaks and subsidies for nuclear power.

One argument for nuclear power is the generation of cheap, carbon-neutral electricity, once hailed as “too cheap to meter.”  But the first seventy-five nuclear power plants that were built went over budget by $100 billion.  The last estimate for cost of a nuclear reactor was $12 billion dollars.  For states that want to expand nuclear energy, this is a big price tag.  In Utah, where they are currently expanding nuclear operations, the entire state budget is $5 million.  The proposal in Emery County, Utah, clearly stated that it plans to use tax dollars to pay for its installation. Check out more about this particular project, and who is paying for it, here.

So we’re already paying for nuclear power.  We’ve gone way over budget on nuclear power in the past.  And all of this for an upside to our proliferation of nuclear weapons?  Now that I’ve got your attention, stay tuned for the environmental costs of nuclear energy, both in production of electricity and disposal of waste.

Fight the good fight,

Johanna Hudgens

Wellesley College

Class of 2009

Tags: global warming, Johanna Hudgens, money, nuclear energy, utah
Posted in news | No Comments »

Millennials Changing America: Feeling the Pinch

Tuesday, November 18th, 2008

The young people I’ve spoken with thus far are varying levels of worried by the issues facing the global economy. A few days back, I talked with FORGE, an organization staffed by mid-20-somethings and concerned primarily with refugee issues in Africa. They reported being in crisis mode due to failure to meet a series of fundraising goals set earlier in the year. They’re handling the issue in an interesting, new-school manner by being absolutely transparent about the issues they are facing. As it had been explained to me by a social entrepreneurship blogger before my meeting with them, Sean Stannard-Stockton’s from Tactical Philanthropy “has a big axe to grind about transparency and started creating a whole world/web of resources around it. A professional consultant is now helping forge on the condition that Sean blogs brutally and realistically about it.” Mission Recognition takes a look at the approach here.

I have noticed, however, that fears on the West Coast seem a little less extreme than those based in the East (New York especially) where there exists an air of economic fear in the air everywhere you turn. Presumably, this could ultimately be related to the financial bases of both locales (Wall St., devastated, lies at the heart of New York while Silicon Valley is still chugging along in San Francisco), but both New York and California are facing substantial budget shortfalls and post-election elation is starting to slip back onto a sense of grim realism for those whose budgets and salaries are contingent of the the public’s ability to give.

Meredith at Ypulse takes a look at this very issue and suggests that despite our collective worry, we’re optimistic: “While millennials are certainly aware of the dire financial times we live in, our general attitude towards the future remains optimistic.”

As far as I can tell in my experience, yes, we are worried. Perhaps we’re optimistic, but we’re certainly cautious about said positivity. New Yorkers appear to be sweating a bit more than those in L.A. and San Francisco Bay, but we all know that we’re in for a pinch. I’ll keep you posted as we get a better collective sense of which way, exactly, the wind is blowing.

Tags: Add new tag, Alex Steed, Millennial Generation, Millennials Changing America
Posted in news | No Comments »

The Future of Energy

Sunday, November 16th, 2008

Do you remember all of the drills you had to do as a kid in elementary school?  We were ready for the natural disasters of our time, hiding under our desks or against the wall in the hallways, crouched on the ground with our hands covering our heads.  By the time I was in middle school, we had a new drill, a lockdown.  After Columbine, there was the covering of windows, locking of doors, and remaining still and quiet with the lights off until further notice.

Catawaba Nuclear Power Plant in York County, SC.

When I was growing up, though, there was always one more drill for the students in Charlotte, North Carolina.   I went to school within six miles of a nuclear power plant, and at least twice a year we would carry out the plan for what to do in the instance of a nuclear meltdown.  It naively consisted of meeting outside of the school—symbolically, on the map of the US, painted on the black top—and waiting for buses to pick us up and take us away from the radioactive poison in the air.

My mom’s plan, I’m told, was to go outside, hold hands, and prepare to die.  It never occurred to me until my freshman year in college, in a class on energy, that having a nuclear meltdown drill was abnormal.  My sophomore year of college, they started giving out potassium iodide pills to everyone within ten miles of the Catawaba plant; to counteract radiation, you were supposed to take this pill within fifteen minutes of a nuclear accident or attack.  My family didn’t get them, though.  We live so close to the nuclear plant that the pills would be useless.

So, as we usher in a new administration in January, I want to talk about two of the components of Obama’s “alternative energy” plan: nuclear power and “clean” coal, starting with nuclear.  This is the blueprint for energy that we should be looking forward to under the Obama Administration:

Nuclear and coal power make up more than ninety percent of North Carolina’s electricity and, like most of the nation, the state plans on expanding these sources.

In the coming weeks, I’ll post a bit more about my problems with an energy policy that is dominated by the word “alternative” rather than “renewable.”  I’ll give some facts on nuclear and coal power as it relates to two of replyforall’s causes—Global Warming and Clean Water, and track with you the nation’s push for and against these sources of energy.  Stay tuned for more!

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

Wellesley College

Class of 2009


Tags: Catawaba, energy, Johanna Hudgens, North Carolina, Nuclear, Obama, York County
Posted in news | No Comments »

"Yes We Did:" so now what?

Saturday, November 15th, 2008

Election 2008 is a great memory for me.  It was my first opportunity to vote in the Presidential election, and being registered in the newly-categorized “swing state” of North Carolina meant that my liberal ballot might not go unnoticed.  To see it turn blue after years of Republican domination was as shocking and joyous an occasion as Mr. Obama being elected nationwide.  Yes, we did!

That's me, second from the left, celebrating at Wellesley CollegeSecond from the right this time, with a big smile for Obama's victory

That’s me, second from the left and then second from the right, celebrating in Punch’s Alley at Wellesley

That evening, as I sat in Wellesley College’s on-campus pub, coloring in my electoral map as CNN called each state for Obama or McCain, I was almost disappointed with how quickly it all seemed to be over.  I had just spent the last two years arguing politics with both close family and complete strangers, and watching the campaigns every step of the way– what was I going to do, now?

Don’t get me wrong, it was great.  Mr. Obama’s victory speech was exactly what I wanted to hear:  a new President who spoke of peace instead of war, of modesty instead of extravagance, of patriotism instead of pride, of responsibility as well as freedoms.  If you missed his speech, or would like to relish in it again, check it out with the full text here.

Best of all was his acknowledgment of every citizen’s role in this election.  More important to me, perhaps, than the man who was elected, was the number of people who voted.  It’s estimated that over 123 million people voted– that’s about 62.8 percent of the voting age population of the United States.  For more statistics, go to the BBC Election page.  Yes, we did!

I mean, honestly, after hearing the horrible things people were saying about Obama which were completely grounded in prejudice, I saw the majority of the nation come to their senses.  Like, hey, maybe not everyone in America is a selfish, money-loving, earth-destroying parasite.  People registered.  They voted.  Some stood in line for upwards of three hours.

So I’m celebrating.  Maybe not even over Obama, but over the fact that for just a moment– a small, glimmering moment– the people of the United States of America found something to care about enough to act on it to make a difference.  The majority of them.  My sister of thirty-six voted for the 3rd time EVER.  So ya know what, if Obama made having a political opinion cool or sexy, or enraged people enough to get out there to oppose him, he’s done SOMETHING already.  If nothing else, give him a little credit for stirring it up a bit.  And give the majority of the nation credit for breaking that crust of apathy for which our generation known.

So the idea that we should be worried about what Obama will do after he takes his oath is not the issue.  We should be worried about what we’re not doing right now.  Not to sound too much like the Starbucks commercial, but what if we cared as much about these issues to do something every day, not just election day?

My plea with the American people is not to be patient with the new President, come January 2009. In fact, it is just the opposite. Barack Obama stated that, “we are the people we’ve been waiting for.” Hanging modifier aside, he is absolutely right. We are the people we’ve been waiting for. But we’ve been these people all along. So why are we waiting at all? Do we really need to wait until January, when our new President is sworn into office, when he will save us from all of our plights and oppressions?  I fear that citizens will become disillusioned no matter who they voted for, if things do not change fast enough.

The President isn’t going to be America’s savior. We are. We need to stop waiting, and stop expecting someone else to do the saving.

The presidential platform is not the only platform for change, and there are platforms besides political ones– just look at replyforall. In fact, those non-political platforms are usually the ones that get things done. Look around. There are people everywhere. It’s about time we put our trust and hope in each other and in ourselves. So I hope that, come January, Barack Obama will not be leading our nation. Because our nation should be leading him.

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

Wellesley College

Class of 2009

Tags: Election 2008, Johanna Hudgens, Wellesley College
Posted in news | No Comments »

Millennials Changing America: Halfway There

Monday, November 10th, 2008

Hello, all.

I’m presently in San Francisco, where I’ve gotten sick, gotten better, witnessed the butchering of a lamb, met amazing people, eaten a ton of fresh avocado, and walked through a plate glass door. I’m here for another couple of days, I’ll be speaking at NetSquared’s Net Tuesday event tomorrow, and then down to LA and back out East via the South.

Check out this short video introduction I did with Reid Beels, Audrey Eschright, and Robin Parker of The American Red Cross while we were in Portland, Oregon. Robin brought us to an event there called Beer and Blog and we were fortunate to meet rad young people doing rad things:

I hope this finds you well. I’ll be in touch again soon.

Tags: American Red Cross, Audrew Eschright, Millennials Changing America, Reid Beels, Robin Parker
Posted in news | No Comments »

DonorsChoose.org Partners with replyforall!

Wednesday, November 5th, 2008

DonorsChoose.org is a great way for you to support classrooms around the country to make a significant difference in education. At DonorsChoose.org, teachers submit project proposals for materials or experiences their students need to learn. These ideas become classroom reality when concerned individuals, whom we call Citizen Philanthropists, choose projects to fund. Teachers ask, You choose, Students learn.

DonorsChoose.org is asking for your support in winning $10,000 through replyforall’s “Your Message, Your Vote” Contest.  Simply include DonorsChoose.org in your personalized e-mail signature and help DonorsChoose win!

Check out DonorsChoose.org and find a variety of educational projects to support! Also, visit the DonorsChoose.org blog!

Tags: blog, contest, Donorschoose.org, education, support
Posted in news | No Comments »

Millennials Changing America: Garbologists on authenticity.

Monday, November 3rd, 2008

Hello, all!

We’re presently on our way to Portland, Oregon so that we can check out the Bus Project’s Trick or Vote event. We’ll be following folks around and talking with them about how the massive GOTV effort was put planned, organized, and executed.

To digest upon in the meantime, here we feature video of our talk with Gabriel Brown, a Spokane, Washington-based performance artist and Americorps volunteer. We spoke with him for a bit last night. He talked a bit his art — he panhandles, dumpster dives, and begs for high-end consumer goods — and the responses his efforts evoke. Considering talk about a generational embrace for “authenticity” gets thrown around a lot with regard to this particular age-group (applying more, so far as I can tell, to those on the elder end of the generational spectrum), Gabriel’s commentary on trying to display a modern — or “real” — value system by projecting an absurd and ironic image of a feeling of necessity onto high-end consumer goods is an amazingly apt articulation of what is talked up as a generational desire to get to the bottom of what is “real.”

We’ll have more on this, and a ton of fun stuff from Portland coming soon…

Be sure to check out the site in the meantime.

Tags: Activism, Alex Steed, Garbology, Millennials Changing America, Performance Art, Spokane, Washington
Posted in news | No Comments »

sign up for your personalized email signature. works with Yahoo Mail, Gmail, Hotmail or Outlook 2007
  • terms of service |
  • privacy policy |
  • contact us |
  • about us