replyforall
  • faqs
  • blog
    • log in
    • |
    • sign up
    •  
  • sign up
  • how to get your personal email signature for Outlook 2007 or Yahoo Mail, Gmail, Hotmail
  • impact
  • causes
  • the advertising sponsors in your email signature
  • Share |
  • Recent Posts

    • World Water Day is March 22nd, what can you do?
    • The fight to provide clean water
    • replyforall spotlight on: Petfinder.com Foundation
    • States take the lead on animal rights legislation
    • Foie Gras the Faux Pas
  • Archives

    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • July 2008

World Water Day is March 22nd, what can you do?

March 18th, 2010

We’re gearing up for World Water Day, and we hope you’ll be joining us in spreading awareness to the clean water cause.  We’re working with our corporate sponsors and YOU, of course, to support the efforts of Partners in Health and Engineers Without Borders–USA in the work that they do to provide clean water around the world.

Did you know, in a recent report released by the WHO and UNICEF show that some 5.9 billion people, or 87 per cent of the world’s population, now have access to safe drinking water?  This reports suggests that we are on track to meet our 2015 Millennium Development goals.  We’re positive that this in large part to the active nature of local communities, nonprofits like PIH and EWB-USA, and supports like you!

So what can you do this World Water Day to show your support for the clean water cause?  Here are a few of our ideas:

  • Participate in UNICEF’s Tap Project.  Restaurants across the US ask patrons to donate $1 for the tap water they normally enjoy for free, which is then donated to UNICEF. This year, UNICEF Tap Project donations will fund programs in Central African Republic, Guatemala, Haiti, Togo, and Vietnam—countries that UNICEF water and sanitation experts have prioritized for their immediate needs.
  • Leave comments for the EPA on their web forum about how to better protect America’s waters.  That’s right, they’re asking for public input for the next two weeks on how to address and solve some of the most significant water pollution problems facing the nation.  Please leave your ideas!  (You’ll see this is especially important if you’ve been following the Supreme Court decision regarding the EPA’s jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act.)
  • Watch a documentary about water to raise your awareness.  There are some great ones out there, including award winner Up the Yangtze, about the Three Gorges Dam.  Our witty and intelligent friends at the Groundwater Up Project just finished their documentary on issues of clean water in Delhi (though these issues are surely not specific to Delhi).  Check out their trailer:
  • Get your friends to sign up with replyforall!  We are pushing to get enough users to provide 100 families with clean water for 1 year.  If you remember last year, we had enough of your help to build 2 wells for 2 villages!  Help us this year to reach our goal– we need less than 300 new replyforall users to get there, so spread the word!
If you have other ways that you can support the clean water cause, comment below or send us a shout out on Facebook or Twitter!  We know our users are both aware and active, and we’re so glad to have you on the replyforall team.
Fight the Good Fight,
Johanna Hudgens
This signature helps provide clean water if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Provide Clean Water
Between 1990 and 2004, 62 million more people in rural sub-Saharan Africa gained access to water supplies.
By using this email signature, Johanna and Engineers Without Borders-USA provided an hour of clean water for 9 people.
Related articles to check out:
  • Pete Wentz: UNICEF’s New Tap Project Spokesperson! (justjared.buzznet.com)
  • Global Access To Safe Drinking Water Increased, Sanitation Lagging Behind, WHO-UNICEF Report Finds (medicalnewstoday.com)
  • Toxic Waters: Rulings Restrict Clean Water Act, Hampering E.P.A. (nytimes.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: clean water, Drinking water, Environment, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, Johanna Hudgens, March 22, Millennium Development Goals, provide clean water, Replyforall, Supreme Court of the United States, tap project, UNICEF Tap Project, United States, Water pollution, world water day

Posted in news | No Comments »

Share |

The fight to provide clean water

March 11th, 2010

World Water Day is fast approaching, and the news scene is bursting at the seams with stories surrounding the clean water cause.

For instance, the US Supreme Court has limited the jurisdiction of the EPA to make businesses clean up polluted water, because it’s “uncertain” which waterways are protected by the Clean Water Act. It meant that, according to an EPA lawyer in Atlanta, they’ve had to shut down clean water programs in some states. That’s right, shut down.

On the bright side, the EPA has been able to cut some deals to protect our water systems.  A railroad company in South Carolina agreed to pay $4 million for clean up, as well as restock fish and provide additional training, after the EPA Justice Department filed charges stating they’d broken the Clean Water Act.

Even in Pakistan, the Sindh High Court demanded a report from a government regulatory agency describing suggestions to get clean water to people in Karachi in two weeks.  Two weeks!  The government over there moves so quickly, don’t you think?

So what are you doing for World Water Day?  March 22nd is coming up quick!  This Sunday, you can check out MTV’s documentary called “Summit on the Summit,” about climbing Mt. Kilimanjaro to raise awareness of the water issues worldwide.  Check out the trailer:

We’d love to hear your feedback after you see the documentary.  We’ve got a couple more suggestions, too, but we’ll share those with you soon.  For now, maybe you could check out the World Water Day web page. And of course, you can garner support for clean water initiatives just by using replyforall’s free email signature.  replyforall wants to get enough new and active supporters this month that we can provide clean water for 100 families for 1 year.  Think you can help and ask your friends to join?

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

This signature helps provide clean water if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Provide Clean Water
Daily indoor per capita water use in the typical single family home is 69.3 gallons.
By using this email signature, Johanna and Partners In Health provided an hour of clean water for 960 people.
Related articles to check out:
  • Supreme Court Rulings Make it Safe for Many Water Polluters (grantlawrence.blogspot.com)
  • EPA Vows Better Enforcement Of Clean Water Act (huffingtonpost.com)
  • Bill Chameides: USA’s Open Season on Chemical Dumping (huffingtonpost.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: Clean Water Act, Karachi, MTV, Pakistan, provide clean water, Replyforall, South Carolina, Summit on the Summit, Supreme Court of the United States, world water day

Posted in news | 1 Comment »

Share |

replyforall spotlight on: Petfinder.com Foundation

March 1st, 2010

hi all,
Meet  Petfinder.com Foundation, one of the non-profits representing our defend animal rights cause.



What is the mission of your organization?
We help homeless pets by saving lives through adoption, helping shelters prepare for, and recover from, disaster and working to make shelters across the country more sustainable.
What sets your organization apart from other groups in a similar field?
We solely support animal shelters dedicated to serving the greater good of animal welfare. We provide grant funding to animal organizations to ensure that no pet has to be euthanized for lack of funding.

In what new ways have you reached out to supporters in the last year?
We’ve been really focusing on providing the public with excellent customer service and providing grants to encourage it. This helps ensure the public has the best experience possible, and encourages a positive view of the animal welfare field. We’ve also introduced a Foundation photo store to assist with animal welfare awareness.

Aside from donations, what is the one thing that supporters can do to support your organization’s work?
Donations are always welcome as well as getting the word out about the Foundation. Our best way of supporting our mission to helping homeless pets is by making the community aware of them!

visit Petfinder.com Foundation to find an animal shelter near you and helpful video tips for adopting, training, and caring for your animal.
stay tuned next month for our next profile! email us if you have any questions to include for any of our partner orgs.

thanks for your continued support,

the replyforall team

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: Adoption, animal rights, Animal shelter, Animal welfare, Petfinder.com Foundation, Replyforall

Posted in Uncategorized, news | No Comments »

Share |

States take the lead on animal rights legislation

February 24th, 2010

Over the last few weeks, a lot has been happening in state legislatures regarding breeding facilities, animal abuse, and chaining dogs. We wanted to update you about a few of them so together we can celebrate this huge step forward in protecting animal rights.

Regulating “Puppy Mills”

This week in Iowa, the state legislature passed a bill that would require more regulation of dog breeding facilities, often called puppy mills.  The bill, awaiting the governor’s signature as I write this, would give greater state oversight of the facilities to ensure the animals are well treated.  Some legislators, however, expressed concern that this type of bill would lead to regulating livestock raised for food production (animal agriculture is exempt from the regulation).  As one Republican state senator said, “They’re going to be back next year…they’re going to ask to restrict layer cages. They’re going to ask to eliminate gestation crates for sows. They’re going to make sure that our livestock has access to open air at all times [or] something like that, it’s coming.”  Bring it on, we say!

Regulating Dogs on Chains

Many states already have regulation regarding tethering or chaining dogs.  According to the Animal Law Coalition, thirteen states have already passed laws requiring shelter or minimum tether lengths, and similar bills are being considered in seven other states.  One bill in Illinois would be the strictest yet– requiring that tethered dogs must be visible to the owners.  This reflects laws passed in counties already like Ashville, NC and Miami/Dade County, FL.  Abolishing the practice altogether would be difficult, however, when it comes to enforcing such a law.

Animal Abuse Registry

This might be the most progressive animal rights bill yet, and it comes from the sunny state of California.  A bill proposed in the state legislature would create an online registry for animal abusers; similar to a sex offenders registry, it would include the abusers’ home addresses and places of employment.  Any person convicted of a felon involving animal cruelty would be registered.  The bill stems from evidence that animal abuse is often a warning sign of future, more heinous crimes.   Similar bills have been introduced in other states, but none have been passed.  What do you think about having a state registry of animal abusers?  Let us know!

Picture 1These are just a few examples of the coming surge of animal rights bills in legislatures across the United States.  And most of our readers believe that it is up to the government to protect animal rights– check out the results from our last poll.

Come back next week as we wrap up our focus on protecting animal rights with a profile of one of our nonprofit partners, PetFinder.com Foundation.

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

This signature helps defend animal rights if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Defend Animal Rights
As many as 100 million invertebrate animals are used for testing each year.
By using this email signature, Johanna and ASPCA provided an hour of protective services for 52 animals.
Related articles to check out:
  • Farmers fight back against animal rights groups (sfgate.com)
  • Registering animal abusers like sex offenders (timesunion.com)
  • Iowa lawmakers consider dog breeder measure (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: Agriculture, animal rights, Animal welfare, California, Cruelty to animals, Iowa, Johanna Hudgens, protect animal rights, Puppy mill, Replyforall, United States

Posted in news | No Comments »

Share |

Foie Gras the Faux Pas

February 17th, 2010

Survey Results Petri PorkWell, the results are in!  Two weeks ago we surveyed our users to find out if they would eat lab-grown pork, and if they supported cosmetics testing on human skin cells.  Over half of our users believe that they would maybe try Petri Pork, citing that if it tastes good, why not?  One respondent even wrote, “We eat produce that’s been genetically modified-is this such a stretch?”  Very true– who can forget about the strawberries with fish DNA?  When it comes to cosmetics testing, 91% of our survey respondents support the use of human skin cells in place of animals.

Picture 3

This week, we wanted to tell you about some legislation going through a couple of states.  First, if you’ve been following replyforall on Facebook, you may have seen a post we published about Leona Lewis, who refused to perform at a British awards show until they took Foie Gras off the menu.

Now, in Hawaii, a bill hopes to ban the dish completely from the state.   Foie gras, french for “fat liver,” depends on force feeding ducks and geese several times a day until they develop liver disease.  This causes the liver to swell up to ten times their normal size; and yes, that is the delicacy people pay so much money to eat.

Some food bloggers, including former pastry chef Edward T. Morita, says the force feeding isn’t cruel, citing that “ducks and geese don’t have a gag reflex, so it doesn’t bother them at all.”  Regardless of the force feeding, is he implying that liver disease isn’t painful?

Hawaii isn’t the first state to take this legislative step to protect the rights of geese and ducks in factory farms.  California has passed a ban to take effect in 2012– this coming from a state where half of the US production of foie gras takes place.  Even Chicago voted to ban the dish, but it was repealed just two years later.

What do you think? Take our quick poll below!

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

This signature helps defend animal rights if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Defend Animal Rights
Most captive parakeets die within 2 years of birth, compared to 8 in the wild, usually due to negligence.
By using this email signature, Johanna and ASPCA provided an hour of protective services for 47 animals.

Related articles to check out:
  • End the horror of foie gras (thepetitionsite.com)
  • Britain Embraces Faux Gras, An Alternative To Unethical Delicacy (huffingtonpost.com)
  • Chef criticized for foie gras on menu (cbc.ca)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: animal rights, California, ducks, Factory farming, Foie gras, Force-feeding, geese, Hawaii, Johanna Hudgens, Leona Lewis, Liver, Replyforall

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Share |

replyforall spotlight on: Partners in Health

February 8th, 2010

hi there, everyone!

we’re excited to kick-off the 1st of a new series in which we feature one of our partner organizations each month.  quickly skim it to learn a bit more about our partners’ great work!

we kick off with our non-profit partner Partners in Health.  they’ve been working in Haiti for over two decades.


What is the mission of your organization?
Partners In Health (PIH) works in 12 countries to deliver quality health care to people and communities devastated by joint burdens of poverty and disease.  PIH’s work has three goals: to care for patients, to alleviate the root causes of disease, and to share lessons learned around the world.

What sets your organization apart from other groups in a similar field?

First, while our health centers and hospitals provide a full range of medical care, we take a comprehensive view of health, which includes programs that address potable water, nutrition, housing, and education. Second, we invest in both the public health infrastructure by accompanying Ministries of Health in their activities, and in the local workforce by relying on paid and trained community health workers in the countries where we work. Lastly, PIH stands out because of our extremely low overhead rate: 94% of every dollar raised goes directly to our programs around the world.

What’s the context for PIH’s presence in Haiti?
For more than 20 years, PIH has been providing vital health care services in Haiti’s Central Plateau and Artibonite Valley.  Working alongside the Ministry of Health to serve a catchment area of 1.2 million people, PIH has become one of the largest health care providers in the country. PIH already had more than 100 doctors, 600 nurses, and a total of 4,000 employees on the ground in Haiti working from 12 existing PIH medical facilities in Haiti before the earthquake struck.

In what new ways have you reached out to supporters in the last year?
We have been working extensively with our supporters to help them form “Communities of Concern,” supporter-driven groups that raise awareness and funds for PIH’s work around the world. We have also released online tools that allow our supporters to initiate personalized fundraising campaigns, connect with other advocates and PIH supporters, and communicate with PIH staff. Learn more at http://act.pih.org.

Aside from donations, what is the one thing that supporters can do to support your organization’s work?
Stay informed and raise awareness:

· Friend us on Facebook

· Follow us on Twitter

· Join our mailing list

stay tuned next month for our next profile! email us if you have any questions to include for any of our partner orgs.

thanks for your continued support,

the replyforall team

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: Haiti, Health care, HIV/AIDS, Partners in Health, provide clean water, Replyforall

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Share |

Tech alternatives to testing, eating animals

February 2nd, 2010

Cruelty is a big topic when considering the rights of our animal friends, and science seems to be taking the lead over legislation.   The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in US v. Stevens that selling videos of dog fights and animal brutality and such is completely protected under our First Amendment rights.  (For the record, dogfighting is illegal in all 50 states and a felony in most.  The message here: apparently it’s not okay to harm animals, but if you just so happen to have video of the heinous crime, it’s totally fine to sell it for a profit.)  This is going on at the same time New Zealand is working to toughen penalties for those who harm animals.

Luckily, it looks like science is making some forward strides in animal rights when it comes to cosmetic testing and what I like to call Petri Pork.  Both take the animal out of the situation and use cells instead.   L’Oreal helped to fund research at the Hurel Corp. to create technology that uses lab-grown human skin cells.  There’s still a long way to go to make sure that the results are accurate, but if so, mice and guinea pigs could be spared.  That’s huge, since it’s estimated that 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals are used for testing each year (almost all die, either from the testing or euthanasia).  Is it worth it to manipulate human cells if it means sparing the lives of millions of animals?

What about stem cells?  Scientists in the Netherlands have developed a way to use the stem cells of pigs to grow meat in a petri dish.  They believe that, once embraced, the practice could alleviate world hunger, save the lives of pigs, and offer a green solution to raising livestock.  The only question is, who will eat Petri Pork?  While factory farming isn’t all that natural, either, meat from a petri dish may be a hard sell… what do you think? Take our poll at the bottom of this page!

If you have any news that you’d like to see shared with our replyforall users, email Johanna with your article, video, or link!  We’d love to hear from you.

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

This signature helps defend animal rights if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Defend Animal Rights
To make foie gras birds are force-fed huge amounts of food, leading to enlarged livers & internal damage.
By using this email signature, Johanna and ASPCA provided an hour of protective services for 19 animals.

Related articles to check out:
  • Court takes up free-speech case of pit bull videos (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
  • Lawmakers Forced to Choose Between Welfare of Budget, Animals (takepart.com)
  • Animal welfare victories prompt farmers’ PR moves (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
  • Food and Feelings: Animals and the Ethics Behind Eating (replyforall.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: animal research, animal rights, animal testing, Animal welfare, Factory farming, Johanna Hudgens, New Zealand, pig stem cells, protect animal rights, Replyforall, United States

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Share |

Supporting Haiti with replyforall

January 20th, 2010

This morning, a 6.1 aftershock quake hit Port-au-Prince.  While families search for food, water, and missing people, replyforall keeps Haiti in the forefront of our thoughts.

Americans are showing that little by little, individual actions are making a difference.  After last Tuesday’s devastating 7.0-magnitude earthquake in Haiti, over $200 million have been raised through texts, calls, and mail.  And over $22 million was raised for the Red Cross through ten dollar donations made by texting “HAITI” to 90999.

Our nonprofit partner, Partners In Health, has been on the ground in Haiti for over 20 years.  PIH co-founder, Paul Farmer, wrote an op-ed in the Miami Herald about what can be done right now to best help the survivors in Haiti, because “there are lessons to be learned from our efforts, not always honorable or effective, to help Haiti over the past two centuries. This can change and must do so, if we are to be real partners in responding to this latest misfortune.”

One of Farmer’s suggestions was not to give in-kind donations, but financial ones.  We know that small amounts can make a huge difference, and we are urging our replyforall users to do their part by sending emails.  One thing that is needed by the earthquake survivors, and by the PIH doctors who are caring for them, is clean water.  Your clean water cause signature raises donations for Partners In Health (and Engineers without Borders) with every email you send.

And you’ll notice that, in our sponsor section of the signature, there is a link for your email recipients to learn more about how to help Partners In Health in their relief efforts in Haiti.  It’s important that we do as much as we can, as soon as we can.  So if you can donate, text GIVE to 25383 to donate $10 to Partners in Health.  If you can’t donate, please put out the word through your emails for others who can!

You can also keep up with what Partners In Health is doing in Haiti by following them on Twitter, @PIH_org.

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

This signature helps provide clean water if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Provide Clean Water
1.8 million children die every year as a result of diseases caused by unclean water and poor sanitation.
By using this email signature, Johanna and Partners In Health provided an hour of clean water for 846 people.
Related articles to check out:
  • If Haiti is to `build back better’ (3quarksdaily.com)
  • Local donors dig deep for quake victims (windsorstar.com)
  • Haiti devastation emerges (theworld.org)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: Caribbean, clean water, Earthquake, Haiti, Johanna Hudgens, Miami Herald, Partners in Health, Paul Farmer, Port-au-Prince, Replyforall

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Share |

Food and Feelings: Animals and the Ethics Behind Eating

January 13th, 2010

There was a wide range of reactions to my post on environmental effects of meat production, and a couple of them I found to be very interesting.  I think it’s important to remember that there are many reasons that people cut meat down or out of their diet completely.   Food choices are important to those of us who may not be particularly passionate about animal rights because it affects our water, our air, and our health.  But at the core of meat and dairy is the ethics behind raising or, to be more accurate, producing animals for consumption.  Did you know:

  • In 2003, the US slaughtered 9.1 BILLION animals — 8.68 billion were chickens alone.  This also doesn’t include aquatic animals (no official count) or animals that die on the farms or in transit (around 100 million).
  • In factory farms, animals are crammed into windowless sheds, wire cages, gestation crates, and other confinement systems.  Many do not ever see the sun until they are loaded on trucks to be killed.
  • Dairy cows must be repeatedly impregnated in order to continue producing milk.  According to the USDA in 2004, 9 million cows on dairy farms live in large sheds or mud lots where disease is common.
  • Pigs are considered smarter than the average 3-year old human.  Pigs, chickens, cattle and sheep are all sentient beings, meaning that– according to Darwin– they have “the same senses, intuitions, and sensations, similar passions, affections and emotions . . . the same faculties of imitation, choice, imagination, the association of ideas and reason though in very different degrees.”

If you can stand it, you can watch a short clip on what factory farming actually looks like.  The terms “factory” and “farm” together seem like an oxymoron, don’t they?

The facts I listed are not to make you feel guilty, but rather to make you aware.  We can get bogged down with the overwhelming evidence that animals are mistreated on farms, to the point that we compartmentalize and put it out of our heads whenever a food decision is made.  But we should know where our food comes from, right?

As one of our users commented on our last post, if you feel like eating a hamburger, eat it.  I certainly do not hold back if I really want that turkey sandwich.  But I am better about whether or not I need to eat meat every day, at every meal.  And when I do eat meat, I know exactly how I’m affecting the world around me.

Another commenter suggests eating organic.  That’s a good idea, and I would suggest eating local, too, since there is always greater transparency and accountability if you can visit the farm 30 miles away.  And you’re supporting your community economically (a la the Slow Money Movement).  You can check for farms near you by visiting Local Harvest, or by stopping by your local farmer’s market.

What are your feelings on this topic, and what advice would you give our readers about food?

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

This signature helps defend animal rights if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Defend Animal Rights
2.95 million mice were used in the UK for testing in 2006.
By using this email signature, Johanna and ASPCA provided an hour of protective services for 15 animals.
Related articles to check out:
  • Farmers fight back against animal rights groups (sfgate.com)
  • The Meatrix: The Revolting Reality of Factory Farming (naturalbias.com)
  • Ethical Eating (timesunion.com)
  • Interview With A Vegan, Part Two (themoderatevoice.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: Agriculture, animal rights, Animal welfare, Factory farming, Farmers' market, Johanna Hudgens, Local Harvest, Replyforall

Posted in news | 1 Comment »

Share |

Food for thought: eating to support animals, people, and a cleaner environment

January 6th, 2010

As I said in my last post, I’m trying to live more consciously, taking into account how my decisions affect the world around me.  I thought food was a good, though perhaps the hardest, place to start.  So how can my (and your) food choices support animal rights, the fight on global warming and poverty, and clean water?  It’s all connected, even if we tend to compartmentalize to lessen our guilty conscience.

“People adapt their attitudes to specific contexts and may actively avoid learning about specific animal procedures and uses to minimize cognitive conflict,” said Dr. Grahame J. Coleman, professor at Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, and deputy director of the Animal Welfare Science Centre.

I have to agree.  I’m guilty, for sure.  I don’t want to think about my pizza’s production process, or the rights related to that rib-eye.  But some facts should be hard to ignore:

  • The USDA reports that animals in the US meat industry produce 61 million tons of waste each year, which is 130 times the volume of human waste – or five tons for every US citizen.
  • The 7 billion livestock animals in the United States consume five times as much grain as is consumed directly by the entire American population.
  • Agriculture accounts for 87 percent of all the fresh water consumed each year. Livestock directly use only 1.3 percent of that water. But when the water required for forage and grain production is included, livestock’s water usage rises dramatically. Every kilogram of beef produced takes 100,000 liters of water. Wheat takes 900 liters of water per kilogram, and producing potatoes uses 500 liters of water per kilogram
  • According to the EPA, hog, chicken and cattle waste has polluted 35,000 miles of rivers in 22 states and contaminated groundwater in 17 states. (The EPA has begun to crack down on Clean Water Act violations at livestock feeding operations.)
  • Animal production, whether for meat or dairy, is hazardous for the atmosphere.  In fact, a 2006 UN report states that meat industry alone accounts for more greenhouse gases than the emissions of all the SUVs, cars, trucks, planes, and ships combined.

You can find more facts about food production’s harmful effects by checking out books like Omnivore’s Dilemma, Livestock’s Long Shadow, and Making a Killing, to name a few.  And check out this UK site about how to sustain a healthier diet and a healthier planet (which just so happens to be animal-friendly, too), or this compassionate eating guide.  Every time you sit down to eat, think about it.

What are your thoughts on the topic?

Fight the Good Fight,

Johanna Hudgens

This signature helps defend animal rights if you click to 'Always Display Images'
sponsored by
Defend Animal Rights
The fur industry demands the thicker pelt of an older animal and almost no fur comes from the slaughterhouses.
By using this email signature, Johanna and ASPCA provided an hour of protective services for 12 animals.
Related articles to check out:
  • Animal Welfare Victories Prompt Farmers to Change – ABC News (abcnews.go.com)
  • Livestock accounts for 51% of greenhouse gas emissions, says new report (energyrefuge.com)
  • Jeff Biggers: New Year’s Resolution: Mountaintop Removal Ends in 2010 (huffingtonpost.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: animal rights, clean water, Clean Water Act, diet, global warming, Johanna Hudgens, Livestock, Livestock's Long Shadow, Making a Killing, Omnivore's Dilemma, poverty, Replyforall, United States

Posted in news | 2 Comments »

Share |
« Older Entries
sign up for your personalized email signature. works with Yahoo Mail, Gmail, Hotmail or Outlook 2007
  • terms of service |
  • privacy policy |
  • contact us |
  • about us